That's an interesting question because understanding the difference between a class and an ID in CSS is crucial for organizing and styling web elements effectively. In my experience, I like to think of a class as a reusable style that can be applied to multiple elements, whereas an ID is unique and should only be used once per page.

I've found that classes are particularly useful when you want to apply the same style to multiple elements, such as buttons or form inputs. On the other hand, IDs are great for targeting a specific element on the page, like a navigation menu or a specific section. In my projects, I tend to use classes for general styling and IDs for more unique, one-off situations.

The box model is a fundamental concept in CSS, and I've found that it's essential for understanding how elements are positioned and sized on a web page. A useful analogy I like to remember is that every element in CSS is essentially a rectangular box, and this box consists of several layers.

From the innermost layer to the outermost, these layers include: content, padding, border, and margin. The content is the actual text or image within the element, while padding is the space between the content and the border. The border surrounds the padding and content, and finally, the margin is the space outside the border, separating the element from its neighbors.

In my experience, understanding the box model helps me correctly position and size elements on the page, as well as troubleshoot layout issues by adjusting the padding, border, or margin as needed.

That's interesting because relational databases and NoSQL databases cater to different needs and use cases. A relational database is based on the relational model, which organizes data into tables with rows and columns. These tables are related to each other using primary and foreign keys. The most common query language for relational databases is SQL. Examples of relational databases include MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Oracle.

On the other hand, a NoSQL database is a non-relational database that doesn't use tables with rows and columns. Instead, it employs a variety of data models such as document, key-value, column-family, and graph. NoSQL databases are known for their flexibility, scalability, and performance. Examples include MongoDB, Cassandra, and Redis.

In my experience, I would choose a relational database when the data has a well-defined schema and requires complex relationships, transactions, and consistency. For example, an e-commerce website with customer, order, and product information would benefit from a relational database.

Conversely, I would choose a NoSQL database for cases where the data is unstructured, the schema is flexible, or the application requires horizontal scaling. A good example is a real-time chat application where the data can be stored as documents in a NoSQL database like MongoDB.

RESTful API design is a set of architectural principles for designing networked applications. REST stands for Representational State Transfer. The idea behind REST is to treat resources, such as data objects, as URLs that can be accessed and manipulated using standard HTTP methods like GET, POST, PUT, and DELETE.

I like to think of it as a way to create a simple, easy-to-understand, and scalable API that can be consumed by various clients, including web browsers, mobile devices, and other servers. The main reasons why RESTful API design is considered a best practice are:

1. Statelessness: Each request from a client contains all the information needed by the server to process it. This means the server doesn't need to maintain session information, making it easier to scale and distribute the application.
2. Cacheability: Responses from the server can be cached by the client, improving performance and reducing server load.
3. Uniform Interface: A consistent and intuitive API design makes it easier for developers to understand and use the API.

From what I've seen, using RESTful API design principles helps create a more maintainable, scalable, and efficient web API that can handle a wide range of use cases.

In my experience, ensuring the security of a web application on the back-end involves several key considerations:

1. Authentication and Authorization: Implement a robust authentication mechanism, such as OAuth or JWT, to verify user identity and restrict access to resources based on user roles and permissions.
2. Data Validation and Sanitization: Validate all user input on the server-side to prevent attacks like SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS). Sanitize data before storing it in the database.
3. Secure Communication: Use HTTPS to encrypt data transmitted between the client and the server, protecting sensitive information from eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle attacks.
4. Access Control: Implement role-based access control to limit the actions and data available to different users based on their roles and permissions.
5. Error Handling and Logging: Log security-related events and monitor them for suspicious activity. Handle errors gracefully, avoiding the exposure of sensitive information.

I've found that following these best practices helps create a more secure back-end that can better protect sensitive data and minimize the risk of security breaches.

I've found that database migrations are essential for managing changes to the database schema, especially in a team environment. In my projects, I typically use migration tools like Flyway or Sequelize, which provide a structured way to create, manage, and apply migrations.

A useful analogy I like to remember is that database migrations are like version control for your database schema. They help keep track of schema changes, apply them in a consistent manner, and even roll them back if necessary.

There are some potential challenges and risks associated with database migrations:

1. Conflicting Changes: When multiple developers work on the same project, there's a risk of conflicting schema changes that can cause issues when applying migrations.
2. Irreversible Migrations: Some migrations, such as dropping a table or column, can result in data loss and may be difficult to reverse. It's essential to carefully plan and test these migrations.
3. Performance Impact: Large migrations can impact the performance of the application, especially when dealing with a significant amount of data. Planning and testing the migrations in a staging environment can help mitigate this risk.

To handle these challenges, I ensure proper communication within the team, use version control systems, and test migrations in a staging environment before applying them to production.

Stateless authentication is a method of verifying user identity without maintaining session information on the server. This can improve scalability and simplify the server-side architecture.

I've found that JSON Web Tokens (JWT) are a popular and effective way to implement stateless authentication. JWT is a compact, URL-safe token format that contains a payload of claims, or assertions, about the user. The token is digitally signed using a secret key, ensuring its integrity and authenticity.

Here's how the process works:

1. The user logs in with their credentials.
2. The server verifies the credentials and generates a JWT, which is signed with a secret key.
3. The server sends the JWT to the client, which stores it, typically in local storage or a cookie.
4. For subsequent requests, the client sends the JWT in the `Authorization` header.
5. The server verifies the JWT signature and extracts the user information from the payload, allowing it to authenticate the user without querying the database or maintaining session state.

By using JWT for stateless authentication, we can create a more scalable and efficient back-end that doesn't rely on session management.

In my experience, effective error handling and logging are crucial for maintaining a stable and secure back-end application. I approach this by following these best practices:

1. Centralized Error Handling: Implement a centralized error handling middleware that catches and processes all errors in the application. This ensures consistency in error responses and reduces code duplication.
2. Graceful Degradation: When an error occurs, fail gracefully by providing a meaningful error message to the user without exposing sensitive information or crashing the application.
3. Logging: Log all error events, including their stack traces and relevant context information. This helps in diagnosing and fixing issues quickly.
4. Monitoring and Alerting: Set up monitoring and alerting tools to notify the team when critical errors occur, allowing for a faster response to incidents.

By following these practices, I can better handle errors in my back-end applications and ensure a more stable and secure system.

JavaScript and TypeScript are both popular programming languages for web development, but they have some key differences:

1. TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript: This means that TypeScript includes all the features of JavaScript, plus some additional features, like static typing and interfaces, that are not present in JavaScript.

2. Type safety: TypeScript introduces static typing, which helps catch type-related errors at compile time rather than runtime. This can lead to fewer bugs and improved code quality.

3. Improved tooling and developer experience: TypeScript's static typing enables better code completion, refactoring, and error checking in IDEs, which can lead to a more productive development experience.

Choosing between JavaScript and TypeScript for a project often depends on the specific needs and preferences of the development team. In my experience, some factors to consider when making this decision include:

1. Team familiarity with the languages: If the team is already comfortable with JavaScript and doesn't require the additional features provided by TypeScript, it may be more efficient to stick with JavaScript.

2. Project complexity and scale: For large or complex projects, TypeScript's static typing and improved tooling can help catch errors early and make the codebase more maintainable.

3. Integration with other technologies: Some libraries or frameworks may have better support for one language over the other, which could influence the decision.

React is a popular front-end library for building user interfaces, and some of its key features include:

1. Component-based architecture: React encourages the creation of reusable components, which can help promote modularity and maintainability in an application.

2. Virtual DOM: React uses a virtual representation of the DOM to efficiently update the UI, resulting in improved performance compared to direct DOM manipulation.

3. One-way data binding: React enforces a unidirectional data flow, which can make it easier to reason about and manage application state.

Comparing React to other popular front-end frameworks like Angular and Vue.js, there are some notable differences:

1. Angular: Angular is a full-featured framework, whereas React is a library focused on UI components. Angular includes built-in functionality for things like dependency injection, two-way data binding, and form validation, which may require additional libraries or custom code in a React application. However, React's smaller scope can make it more lightweight and flexible.

2. Vue.js: Vue.js shares some similarities with React, such as a component-based architecture and a virtual DOM. However, Vue.js also includes some features found in Angular, like built-in directives and two-way data binding. Vue.js is often seen as a middle ground between React and Angular in terms of complexity and feature set.

In my experience, choosing between React, Angular, and Vue.js often comes down to factors like team familiarity, project requirements, and the desired level of built-in functionality versus flexibility.

In my experience, I've worked with Node.js on several projects, ranging from small personal projects to larger team-based applications. I've found that Node.js is a powerful tool for creating server-side applications due to its non-blocking, event-driven architecture and the ability to use JavaScript on both the client and server-side. Node.js is different from traditional server-side languages like PHP or Ruby in a few key ways.

Firstly, Node.js uses JavaScript as its programming language, which allows for a more consistent development experience across both the front-end and back-end of an application. This can lead to increased productivity and easier collaboration among team members.

Secondly, Node.js is built on the V8 JavaScript engine, which is known for its high performance and ability to execute code quickly. This can lead to faster response times and better overall performance for server-side applications.

Finally, the non-blocking, event-driven architecture of Node.js allows for better handling of concurrent connections compared to traditional server-side languages like PHP or Ruby. This means that Node.js can handle more simultaneous connections without suffering from performance degradation, making it a good choice for applications with high levels of user interaction.

Serverless architectures, like the one provided by AWS Lambda, have gained popularity in recent years due to their flexibility, scalability, and cost-efficiency. However, they also come with their own set of challenges. Let's discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of using a serverless architecture.

Advantages of serverless architecture:
1. Automatic scaling: Serverless architectures can scale automatically based on the demand, without any manual intervention. This is especially useful for applications with unpredictable workloads or traffic patterns.
2. Cost-efficiency: With serverless architecture, you only pay for the compute time you actually use, rather than paying for pre-allocated resources. This can lead to cost savings, especially for applications with sporadic usage patterns.
3. Reduced operational overhead: Serverless architectures abstract away the underlying infrastructure, allowing developers to focus on writing code rather than managing servers.

Disadvantages of serverless architecture:
1. Vendor lock-in: Serverless architectures often rely on specific cloud providers, making it difficult to switch to another provider or move to an on-premises solution without significant refactoring.
2. Latency: Due to the nature of serverless architectures, there can be increased latency in the request-response cycle, especially during cold starts when a new instance of a function is being initialized.
3. Limited customization: Serverless architectures may not provide the same level of customization and control as traditional server-based solutions, which can be a disadvantage for certain use cases or applications with specific requirements.

That's interesting because the concept of a virtual DOM is a key feature of modern front-end frameworks like React, and it plays a crucial role in improving the performance of web applications. I like to think of the virtual DOM as a lightweight, in-memory representation of the actual DOM (Document Object Model).

The main idea behind the virtual DOM is to minimize the number of direct interactions with the actual DOM, which can be slow and computationally expensive. Whenever there are changes to the application state, the virtual DOM is updated first. Then, a process called "reconciliation" takes place, which involves comparing the updated virtual DOM with the previous version to calculate the differences, or "diffs." Only the diffs are then applied to the actual DOM, resulting in a more efficient and faster update process.

By using the virtual DOM, React can significantly reduce the number of costly DOM manipulations, leading to improved performance and a smoother user experience.

In my experience, I've found that version control systems like Git are essential for effectively collaborating with other developers on a project. I've used Git extensively in my past projects, both personal and professional, and it has become my go-to tool for managing code versions and tracking changes.

When working with other developers, Git enables us to work on separate branches for different features or bug fixes, ensuring that the main branch remains stable and functional. Additionally, Git allows for easy code reviews and merging of changes back into the main branch once they are approved.

From what I've seen, using Git also helps in maintaining a clear history of the project's development, which is useful for understanding how the codebase has evolved over time and identifying the source of any issues that may arise.

My go-to workflow with Git involves a few key steps, which I believe helps maintain a clean and organized codebase, especially when collaborating with other developers.

1. Create a new branch: Whenever I start working on a new feature or bug fix, I create a new branch from the main branch. This ensures that the main branch remains stable and allows me to work independently without affecting the work of others.

2. Commit changes regularly: As I work on my branch, I make regular commits with clear and descriptive commit messages. This helps me keep track of my progress and makes it easier to revert to a previous state if necessary.

3. Fetch and merge updates from the main branch: Before submitting my changes for review, I fetch the latest updates from the main branch and merge them into my working branch. This helps me avoid potential merge conflicts and ensures that my changes are compatible with the latest version of the codebase.

4. Submit a pull request: Once my changes are complete and tested, I submit a pull request for review. This allows other team members to review my code and provide feedback or suggestions for improvement.

5. Address feedback and merge changes: After receiving feedback on my pull request, I address any concerns or suggestions and update my branch accordingly. Once the changes are approved, I merge my branch back into the main branch, completing the workflow.

By following this workflow, I find that it helps maintain a clean and organized codebase, making it easier to collaborate with other developers and ensure the overall quality of the project.

Merge conflicts in Git can be a bit intimidating at first, but with some experience and best practices, they can be resolved effectively. When a merge conflict occurs, it typically means that changes made in different branches conflict with each other, and Git is unable to determine which version to use. To resolve a merge conflict, I follow these steps:

1. Identify the conflicting files: Git will provide a list of files with conflicts that need to be resolved. I open these files in my code editor to examine the conflicting changes.

2. Review and resolve the conflicts: In the conflicting files, Git will mark the conflicting changes with ">>>>>>," "<<<<<<<," and "=======" separators. I carefully review the changes and decide which version to keep or manually merge the changes as needed.

3. Commit the resolved changes: Once all conflicts have been resolved, I stage the updated files and commit the changes with a descriptive message.

To avoid merge conflicts in the first place, I follow these best practices:

1. Keep branches short-lived: The longer a branch exists, the higher the chances of merge conflicts. By keeping branches short-lived and merging them back into the main branch frequently, I can reduce the likelihood of conflicts.

2. Communicate with team members: Regular communication with team members about ongoing work and potential areas of overlap can help prevent conflicts before they occur.

3. Merge the main branch into your working branch regularly: By frequently merging updates from the main branch into my working branch, I can address any potential conflicts earlier in the development process and avoid larger conflicts later on.

I've worked with both Jira and Trello in various projects, and I find that they are invaluable tools for staying organized and on track in a full stack development project. Each tool has its own unique features and strengths, but the core concept remains the same: breaking down tasks into manageable units and tracking their progress.

In my experience, I typically use these project management tools to:

1. Create and organize tasks: I break down the project into smaller tasks or user stories, which helps me and my team focus on individual components and ensures that nothing is overlooked.

2. Assign and prioritize tasks: I assign tasks to team members based on their expertise and availability, and prioritize tasks based on their importance and dependencies. This helps ensure that critical tasks are completed first and that the project progresses smoothly.

3. Track progress and status: By regularly updating the status of tasks and moving them through different stages (e.g., "To Do," "In Progress," "Done"), I can easily visualize the overall progress of the project and identify any bottlenecks or areas that need attention.

4. Communicate with team members: Project management tools like Jira and Trello often have built-in communication features, such as comments and notifications, which help facilitate discussions and collaboration among team members.

By using project management tools effectively, I find that it helps me stay organized and on track, ensuring the successful completion of full stack development projects.

That's an interesting question because it reminds me of a time when I was working on a project with a team of developers, and we were tasked with building a complex web application for a client. In my experience, teamwork and collaboration are essential for solving difficult technical problems, and this project was no exception.

I recall one particular instance when we encountered a performance issue that was affecting the overall user experience of the application. We had to find a solution, and quickly. My go-to approach in situations like these is to first gather all team members to discuss the problem, ensuring that everyone is on the same page. I find that this helps to establish a shared understanding of the issue and allows us to work together more effectively.

In this case, we began by analyzing the performance issue in-depth, identifying the specific areas of the application that were causing the problem. We then brainstormed potential solutions and assigned tasks to each team member based on their expertise and the requirements of each solution. This division of labor allowed us to tackle the problem from multiple angles simultaneously, increasing the chances of finding a successful resolution.

As we began implementing the proposed solutions, we encountered a few roadblocks, but I've found that maintaining open lines of communication is essential in overcoming these obstacles. By discussing the challenges we faced and sharing our progress, we were able to adapt our approach and refine our solutions as needed.

In the end, our collaborative efforts paid off, and we were able to resolve the performance issue and deliver a high-quality user experience for our client. I like to think of this experience as a testament to the power of teamwork and the importance of approaching difficult technical problems with a combination of open communication, clear division of tasks, and adaptability. It's a useful analogy I like to remember when facing new challenges in my work as a Junior Full Stack Developer.

One project that comes to mind is when I was working on an e-commerce website. Our team got a request to integrate a new payment gateway into the existing system. I was responsible for integrating the new feature, primarily on the backend side but with some front-end elements as well.

The first thing I did was to carefully study the documentation of the new payment gateway and understand its API, required data, and possible response scenarios. I then identified the areas of the codebase where changes were needed, making sure to have a clear understanding of the existing payment flow, database schema, and user interface.

After creating a comprehensive plan, I discussed this with my team lead to ensure that I was on the right track. I received valuable feedback that helped me further refine and optimize the integration process. Then, I started working on the implementation – first, creating a separate branch in our version control system to keep the project stable.

During the implementation phase, I faced a challenge with handling different currency formats between the existing system and the new payment gateway. To overcome this, I created a utility function that would convert the currency format as needed, ensuring smooth communication between the two systems.

Once the feature was implemented, I thoroughly tested the new payment gateway, both in isolation and in conjunction with the existing system. After fixing any identified bugs, I presented the complete feature to my team lead and other stakeholders for review. Following their approval, the new feature was merged into the main branch and deployed to production.

This experience taught me the importance of thorough planning, communication, and adaptability when working on complex projects, as well as how to efficiently integrate new features into an established codebase.

At my last job, we had a production issue that caused the site to load extremely slowly, making it almost unusable. It was critical that we got the issue resolved quickly, as it was impacting our customers and our business. I started by looking at the server logs and monitoring tools to identify any unusual activity or error messages. I noticed that there was a high number of database queries, which was likely causing the slowdown.

To narrow down the issue further, I used the process of elimination. I first disabled non-essential features of the website and monitored the performance to see if there was any improvement. Once I identified the specific feature causing the issue, I dug into the code to see if there were any obvious issues with the implementation. I discovered that a recent change in our database structure had caused an N+1 query problem, where we were making multiple unnecessary queries to the database.

Once I identified the root cause of the issue, I implemented a fix—in this case, using eager loading to optimize the database queries and reduce the load on the server. I tested the fix extensively to ensure it resolved the issue and didn't introduce new problems before deploying it to the production environment.

This experience taught me the importance of thoroughly testing code changes, especially those that impact database queries, and staying vigilant with monitoring and logging tools to catch potential issues early. It also reinforced the value of a systematic approach to debugging, which allowed me to pinpoint and resolve the problem quickly and effectively.

At my previous job, I was responsible for optimizing our company's website when we started noticing a higher bounce rate and longer page load times. We wanted to improve the user experience and make the website more efficient.

First, I used Google Lighthouse to run an audit and identify specific areas of improvement. It highlighted a few issues, such as large image sizes, unused JavaScript, and render-blocking resources. Next, I optimized the images on the website by using image compression tools like TinyPNG, which significantly reduced their sizes and load times.

For the unused JavaScript, I reviewed the code and removed any unnecessary scripts. I also utilized code splitting and lazy loading to load scripts only when needed. To address the render-blocking resources, I inlined critical CSS and deferred less important resources using async and defer attributes.

Once all these adjustments were made, I ran another Google Lighthouse audit to measure the improvements. Our website's performance score improved significantly, the bounce rate decreased, and users reported faster load times. Overall, these optimizations enhanced user experience and increased website efficiency.

Last year, I was working on a web application for a client using Node.js and React. One day, the client called me, quite frustrated, because some features of the app had stopped working unexpectedly. I knew that I had to remain calm, be empathetic, and reassure the client that I would do my best to resolve the issue quickly.

First, I asked for the client's permission to access their system remotely through a screen-sharing tool. Once I had access, I carefully explained my actions to the client as I started troubleshooting. I quickly noticed that some dependencies had been updated recently, causing compatibility issues with the existing code.

I informed the client about my findings and shared that I would need to revert the dependencies to their previous versions. While doing this, I explained the process in simple terms to make sure the client understood what was happening and why. After reverting the dependencies and testing the application, everything worked correctly again.

I then scheduled a follow-up call to discuss the issue, and suggested implementing a version control system to prevent future issues. This experience not only taught me the importance of clear communication with non-technical clients but also the value of a proactive approach to avoid potential roadblocks.

A couple of years ago, I was working on a freelance project, where I had to create a web application for a client. The main challenge was deciding whether to use Angular or React for the front-end framework.

First, I researched both options thoroughly, looking for information on performance, scalability, and learning curve. I experimented with both Angular and React by creating small prototypes, which helped me better understand their pros and cons. I also talked to other developers in my network and on forums to get their opinions and gather real-world experiences.

After analyzing my findings, I chose React as it had a shallower learning curve and a larger community for support and resources. Additionally, I felt that the component-based architecture was more suitable for our project and would allow us to scale quickly.

I communicated my decision to the client, explaining the reasoning behind it, and they were satisfied with my choice. Moving forward, I made sure to monitor and adapt to any challenges that arose during the development process, constantly learning and adjusting as needed. In the end, the project was a success, and I learned the importance of thorough research, open-mindedness, and how critical it is to consult with your peers when making such decisions.

There was a time when I was working on a project where the goal was to create an interactive web application for users to easily order custom-designed products. During the development phase, we received feedback that users found the order form confusing, and it was difficult for them to navigate through the options and visualize the final product.

In order to tackle this issue, I decided to think creatively and offer a more engaging solution. Instead of a traditional form, I proposed creating a step-by-step wizard-like interface where users could interact with a live preview of their custom product as they made selections. This way, they could see real-time updates of their choices, which helped them to better visualize what the finished product would look like.

I collaborated closely with the design team to create a visually appealing and intuitive interface, and I worked on both the front-end and back-end of the web application to ensure a smooth experience for our users. The end result was a significant increase in user satisfaction and a decrease in the number of abandoned orders, thanks to this creative solution.

I remember working on a college project where we had to build a web application for a local event management company. Our team consisted of five members, including myself, and I was responsible for the front-end development of the application.

In the early stages of the project, we realized that there was a lack of clear communication between the back-end developers and the design team. This led to inconsistencies in the application's functionalities and appearance. To address this issue, I took the initiative to schedule and lead daily stand-up meetings to ensure that everyone was on the same page and any issues were addressed promptly.

During the development process, I worked closely with the back-end developers to ensure seamless integration of the front-end and back-end components. I also actively sought feedback from the design team and made necessary changes to the front-end code to provide an optimal user experience. My ability to collaborate effectively and adapt to feedback played a significant role in the project's success.

As a result, our team delivered the web application on time, and the client was extremely satisfied with the final product. This experience taught me the importance of clear communication, effective collaboration, and adaptability in a team-based project. I'm confident that I can apply these skills in a Junior Full Stack Developer role to contribute positively to any team I work with.

There was a time when I was working on a web application project and had to communicate with the marketing team about some technical limitations we were facing. The issue involved restrictions on the amount of data that could be loaded onto a page without negatively impacting the site's performance.

To help them understand, I used an analogy of a truck carrying heavy items. I explained that there's a limit to how many items a truck can carry before it starts to struggle and slow down. Likewise, with websites, there's a limit to the amount of data that can be loaded onto a page before it becomes slow and unresponsive.

In order to ensure they understood, I broke the issue down into smaller parts. I first explained the concept of data on a webpage, then discussed the implications of loading too much data, and finally, connected the issue back to the web application we were working on. Throughout the conversation, I encouraged questions and checked for understanding by asking them to summarize the issue in their own words.

In the end, the marketing team grasped the concept and we were able to collaborate on finding a solution that met both the technical requirements and their marketing goals. This experience taught me the importance of using analogies and breaking down complex concepts into simpler terms when communicating with non-technical colleagues.

Yes, there was a time during a group project in college where we had a team member who had a habit of procrastinating and not meeting deadlines. This was causing the rest of the team a lot of stress since it was affecting the timeline of the project.

First, I requested a one-on-one meeting with the team member to discuss the situation. I made sure to approach the conversation openly, without being accusatory, and listened to their side of the story. I learned that they were struggling with personal issues that were affecting their productivity. Together, we came up with a plan to break down their responsibilities into smaller tasks, which made the workload more manageable for them and allowed them to catch up with the rest of the team.

To ensure accountability, I followed up with them on a weekly basis to check on their progress and offer support as needed. This experience taught me the importance of clear communication and understanding the circumstances that may be affecting a team member's performance. As a result, we were able to complete the project on time and maintain a positive team dynamic. This experience allowed me to grow as a collaborator and problem-solver and has made me more prepared for similar situations in a professional setting.