That's an interesting question, because understanding the difference between a star schema and a snowflake schema is crucial in designing an efficient data warehouse. In a star schema, the central fact table is connected to one or more dimension tables directly without any normalization, making it a denormalized structure. This results in faster query performance, as fewer joins are required to retrieve the data. I like to think of it as a simple, straightforward structure that makes querying data quicker.
On the other hand, a snowflake schema is a normalized version of the star schema, where dimension tables are further split into related sub-dimension tables. This helps in reducing redundancy and storage space. However, it increases the complexity of the schema and requires more joins, which can slow down query performance. From what I've seen, snowflake schemas can be useful in situations where storage space is a concern, and query performance is not a top priority.
In my experience, choosing between a star schema and a snowflake schema depends on the specific needs of the organization and its data warehouse requirements.
On the other hand, a snowflake schema is a normalized version of the star schema, where dimension tables are further split into related sub-dimension tables. This helps in reducing redundancy and storage space. However, it increases the complexity of the schema and requires more joins, which can slow down query performance. From what I've seen, snowflake schemas can be useful in situations where storage space is a concern, and query performance is not a top priority.
In my experience, choosing between a star schema and a snowflake schema depends on the specific needs of the organization and its data warehouse requirements.